research Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination Read Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination
Phoenix Newsletter - March 2025 President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty Read President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty
A Conversation with Dr. Phillip Wagner “Family Medicine Was All I Ever Wanted to Do” Dr. Phillip Wagner Read “Family Medicine Was All I Ever Wanted to Do”
Home Research Research Library Understanding the “sum of subtest to overall score discrepancy” on the MC-FP examination Understanding the “sum of subtest to overall score discrepancy” on the MC-FP examination 2012 Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Cognitive Expertise, and Psychometrics Volume Annals of Family Medicine Source Annals of Family Medicine When high-stakes examinations, such as the American Board of Family Medicine’s (ABFM) Maintenance of Certifi cation-in Family Practice (MC-FP) examination are administered, candidates and diplomates are keenly interested in the accuracy of their test scores, especially when their scores are close to, but below, the pass/fail cut point. In some instances, candidates will attempt to reverse engineer their scores using the information provided on the score report in an effort to verify the “weighted sum of the subtest scores” is congruent with the overall test score. Any discrepancy might become alarming to the candidate, providing a seemingly legitimate reason to believe the overall score was inaccurate, thus prompting a phone call to the ABFM for further investigation and clarifi cation. Historically, such a mistake in scoring has never been found; however, a statistical phenomenon that we will describe below could make it appear so. We would like to explain this phenomenon so that examinees who attempt to reverse engineer their score reports will better understand the “sum of subtest to overall score discrepancy” phenomenon. Read More ABFM Research Read all 2007 Modeling relief Go to Modeling relief 1964 General Practice: A Eulogy Go to General Practice: A Eulogy 2015 The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination Go to The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination 2020 The Built Environment for Professionalism. Go to The Built Environment for Professionalism.
Author(s) Royal, Kenneth D, and Puffer, James C Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Cognitive Expertise, and Psychometrics Volume Annals of Family Medicine Source Annals of Family Medicine
ABFM Research Read all 2007 Modeling relief Go to Modeling relief 1964 General Practice: A Eulogy Go to General Practice: A Eulogy 2015 The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination Go to The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination 2020 The Built Environment for Professionalism. Go to The Built Environment for Professionalism.
2015 The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination Go to The Predictive Validity of the ABFM’s In-Training Examination