research Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination Read Performance Evaluation of the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-4) on the Family Medicine In-Training Examination
Phoenix Newsletter - March 2025 President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty Read President’s Message: ABFM’s Unwavering Commitment to Diplomates and the Specialty
A Conversation with Dr. Phillip Wagner “Family Medicine Was All I Ever Wanted to Do” Dr. Phillip Wagner Read “Family Medicine Was All I Ever Wanted to Do”
Home Research Research Library “Performance in Practice” Modules in the American Board of Family Medicine Maintenance of Certfication for Family Physicians Process. “Performance in Practice” Modules in the American Board of Family Medicine Maintenance of Certfication for Family Physicians Process. 2006 Author(s) Hagen, Michael D Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Professionalism Volume KAFP Journal Source KAFP Journal The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) adopted in 2000 the concept of “Maintenance of Certification” (MOC) for the 24 U.S. medical specialty boards. The MOC concept entails 4 main components: evidence of professional standing, evidence of commitment to lifelong learning, evidence of cognitive expertise as demonstrated by performance on a secure examination, and evidence of evaluation of performance in practice. The American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) has traditionally assessed professional standing by requiring certification candidates to possess an unrestricted license to practice medicine. Continuing education activities have served as a proxy for demonstrating a commitment to life-long learning, and minimal chart audits have served as evidence for evaluation of performance in practice. With implementation of the Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) process in 2004, ABFM has modified these activities to reflect the prospective ongoing assessment approach adopted by ABMS. Read More ABFM Research Read all 2013 Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results Go to Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results 2011 ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry Go to ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry 1980 Family practice Go to Family practice 2021 Reenvisioning Family Medicine Residency Education Go to Reenvisioning Family Medicine Residency Education
Author(s) Hagen, Michael D Topic(s) Family Medicine Certification Keyword(s) Professionalism Volume KAFP Journal Source KAFP Journal
ABFM Research Read all 2013 Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results Go to Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results 2011 ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry Go to ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry 1980 Family practice Go to Family practice 2021 Reenvisioning Family Medicine Residency Education Go to Reenvisioning Family Medicine Residency Education
2013 Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results Go to Criterion-referenced examinations: implications for the reporting and interpretation of examination results
2011 ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry Go to ABFM’s Physicians Quality Reporting System registry
2021 Reenvisioning Family Medicine Residency Education Go to Reenvisioning Family Medicine Residency Education